30 / 32
29
Diretriz AMB
REFERÊNCIAS
1.
Pressure ulcers prevalence, cost and risk assessment: consensus development conference statement: The National
Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Decubitus 1989;2:24-8.
2.
Bauer J, Phillips LG. MOC-PSSM CME article: Pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1-10.
3.
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment
following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24
Suppl 1:S40-101.
4.
Payne WG, Posnett J, Alvarez O, Brown-Etris M, Jameson G, Wolcott R, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical
trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the
treatment of stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 2009;55:50-5.
5.
Thomas DR, Goode PS, LaMaster K, Tennyson T. Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for
pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial. Adv Wound Care 1998;11:273-6.
6.
Ljungberg S. Comparison of dextranomer paste and saline dressings for management of decubital ulcers. Clin Ther
1998;20:737-43.
7.
Püllen R, Popp R, Volkers P, Füsgen I. Prospective randomized double-blind study of the wound-debriding effects
of collagenase and fibrinolysin/deoxyribonuclease in pressure ulcers. Age Ageing 2002;31:126-30.
8.
Müller E, van Leen MW, Bergemann R. Economic evaluation of collagenase-containing ointment and hydrocolloid
dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19:1209-16.
9.
Ford CN, Reinhard ER, Yeh D, Syrek D, De Las Morenas A, Bergman SB, et al. Interim analysis of a prospective,
randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers.
Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:55-61.
10.
Thomas DR, Diebold MR, Eggemeyer LM. A controlled, randomized, comparative study of a radiant heat bandage
on the healing of stage 3-4 pressure ulcers: a pilot study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2005;6:46-9.